3391/25

The construction of a new two storey apartment block under pitched roof consisting of two number 1 bedroom own door apartments with one balcony at first floor level and ond private terrace at ground floor level . 2 number new pedestrian and vehicular accesses , on site parking for 2 vehicles , secure bicycle storage and bin storage . Alterations to site levels plus all associated site works .

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

The proposal was refused due to concerns regarding visual amenity, the protection of the character of the area, and the potential impact on the residential amenity of future occupants, particularly concerning noise from Dublin Airport and insufficient technical details for site services.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The development failed to provide a Noise Impact Assessment to address the residential amenity of future occupants given the site's location within Dublin Airport noise zones.
  • The proposed external finishes and design were deemed potentially inconsistent with the existing character and visual amenity of the Edenmore Crescent streetscape.
  • The application lacked sufficient detail regarding essential infrastructure, including surface water drainage arrangements, waste management facilities, and secure bicycle storage.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Decision Document Summary

The proposal sought the construction of a new two-storey apartment block with a pitched roof on a site adjacent to 39 and 41A Edenmore Crescent, Raheny, Dublin 5. Despite the inclusion of various technical requirements, the planning authority refused permission. The decision focused on the need to protect the visual and residential amenities of the area, citing requirements for noise mitigation due to proximity to Dublin Airport, the necessity for finishes that match the existing neighborhood, a...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.

PDF Document Missing

The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.

Search for case on ABP