Core Refusal Reason
The application for an extension of duration was refused because development had not commenced and no substantial works were carried out, which is a statutory requirement for an extension under Section 42 of the Planning and Development Act 2000 (as amended).
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- A site inspection conducted on 6/3/25 confirmed that no development works had commenced on the site.
- The applicant failed to demonstrate that substantial works were carried out pursuant to the permission during the appropriate period.
- Legislative amendments to Section 42 of the Planning and Development Act 2000 remove the possibility of an extension of duration for un-commenced developments or those where substantial works have not been completed.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
The applicant sought an extension of the appropriate period for a previously granted permission to construct a rear extension and ancillary services at 22 Maunsells Road, Taylors Hill, Galway. Upon assessment, the Planning Authority found that no works had commenced on-site and the applicant confirmed that no substantial works had been undertaken. Due to mandatory requirements under the Planning and Development (Housing) and Residential Tenancies Act 2016, which precludes extending the duration ...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.