Core Refusal Reason
The Planning Authority recommended that further information be sought due to a lack of evidence regarding the structure's previous use as a habitable dwelling and significant concerns regarding its structural integrity to support an extension.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The applicant failed to provide sufficient evidence, such as photographs or official documentation, to demonstrate that the existing derelict structure was last used as a habitable dwelling, which is necessary to assess the proposal under Section 12.8 of the Development Plan.
- There are serious reservations regarding the structural stability of the dilapidated building; a comprehensive structural survey is required to certify that the cottage is capable of accommodating the proposed extension and associated works.
- The submitted site layout plan is deficient as it fails to depict the design and location of the proposed soakpit for surface water disposal, as indicated in the application form.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Chapter 3: People, Places & Houses3.9 Rural Housing3.10 Rural Area TypesChapter 7: Infrastructure, Transport & Communication7.8 Water ServicesChapter 12: Development Management12.7 Rural House Design Considerations12.8 House Extensions (Urban and Rural)County Roscommon Rural Design Guidelines
Decision Document Summary
The proposal seeks permission to refurbish and extend a derelict 19th-century cottage and install a new wastewater treatment system at Newtown Farragher, Four Mile House, Co. Roscommon. While the design is considered acceptable in principle, the Planning Authority recommended a request for Further Information. The decision is based on the structure's current appearance as an agricultural building rather than a residence, the lack of proof of previous habitation, and concerns that the dilapidated...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.