Core Refusal Reason
The proposed two-storey front extension was refused due to its significant negative visual impact on the streetscape, its failure to integrate with the existing residential character, and its adverse impact on the residential amenities of neighboring properties through overlooking and overshadowing.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The development would break the established building line and, due to its height, scale, and poor architectural expression, would constitute a visually obtrusive feature that fails to integrate into the pattern of development in the area.
- The proposal would seriously injure the residential amenities of adjoining properties by creating an overbearing effect and giving rise to overlooking and loss of privacy.
- The extension results in the overdevelopment of the site by removing essential parking space without adequate replacement, thereby contravening the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.
Cited Policies (CDP)
CDP5.9 Ancillary Living AccommodationSection 5.2.8 Ancillary Living CriteriaExisting Residential Zoning Objective
Decision Document Summary
Pat Collins applied for permission to construct a two-storey extension to the front of an existing detached dwelling at No. 9 Powers Court, Tulla, Co. Clare, to be used as a granny flat. The site is located within a residential estate on lands zoned for 'Existing Residential' use. Clare County Council refused the application because the proposed extension's scale and positioning would disrupt the established building line and streetscape, negatively impact the privacy and light of neighboring re...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.