Core Planning Reasoning
The development is recommended for grant as it is consistent with the 'Z1' residential zoning objective and the established pattern of development in the area; it is considered that the modifications would not seriously injure the residential amenities of the area or property in the vicinity.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The rear dormer, as conditioned to a width of 3.1m and set back from the rear wall, is considered typical for the area and would not have a significant detrimental impact on the character of the dwelling or the terrace.
- Given the 26m separation distance between the proposed dormer and the rear garden/windows of Dane Lodge, the Inspector concluded that overlooking and overbearance issues would not be significant.
- The Inspector recommends the omission of the Planning Authority's Condition 3(a), concluding that the front roof windows are acceptable as they provide natural light to the attic and maintain a sense of balance within the terrace row.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Z1 Sustainable Residential NeighbourhoodsPolicy QHSN6 Urban ConsolidationPolicy SC5 Urban Design and Architectural PrinciplesPolicy SC19 High Quality ArchitectureChapter 15 Development StandardsSection 15.4.2 Architectural Design QualitySection 15.9.18 Overlooking and OverbearanceSection 15.11 House DevelopmentsAppendix 18 Residential Extensions (Sections 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 1.4, 1.5, 1.7, 4.0 and 5.0)
Decision Document Summary
The proposal relates to alterations at 23 Vernon Avenue, Clontarf, involving the installation of a rear dormer window and three front roof windows. The Planning Authority (PA) granted permission but imposed conditions reducing the dormer's scale and omitting the front rooflights. This decision was appealed by a third party (neighbor at Dane Lodge) who cited concerns regarding overlooking, loss of privacy, and the impact on the historic character of the terrace. The site is a mid-terrace dwelling...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.
Search for case on ABP