2560301

the as constructed surface water infrastructure including attenuation tanks, pipework and manholes as laid, where they differ from the approved sewer layout; footpaths within the green area; boundary screen walls around the sides and rear of houses 18–22, which vary from the approved drawings; and PERMISSION for alterations to the approved site development works, namely increasing the approved width of footpaths & parking bays from 1.5m to 1.8m and general revisions to the public lighting layout, roads, paths & parking to improve the site layout

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

The application failed to provide sufficient technical documentation to verify the structural integrity of the as-built dwellings, the adequacy of the surface water drainage system, and the safety of the proposed road access and parking arrangements.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The applicant failed to submit essential as-built drawings and structural assessments for the 22 dwellings on-site, making it impossible to determine if the construction complies with approved plans or building standards.
  • The surface water management proposals are technically deficient, lacking necessary design calculations, infiltration testing, and adherence to contemporary Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SUDS) standards.
  • The proposed site access onto the R494 presents significant road safety hazards due to inadequate sightlines and unresolved legal interest regarding the land required for the entrance and visibility splays.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Objective 5-2Objective 5-5Objective 5-15Objective 11-4Objective 15-6Objective 15-7Section 4.7Section 4.10Section 6.1Section 6.1.1Standard 6.5.1

Decision Document Summary

The proposal seeks the retention of as-constructed infrastructure (drainage, paths, walls) and permission for site alterations (widening paths/parking, lighting) at a 22-unit residential development at Schoolhouse Row, Portroe, Co. Tipperary. While the site is appropriately zoned 'Existing Residential', the application was refused due to a comprehensive lack of technical detail. The Planning Authority cited major concerns regarding the structural safety of the existing buildings, the unusual and...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.