3787/23

RETENTION: For off street parking to the front of my residence and vehicular access to same at 16 Newgrove Avenue, Sandymount, Dublin 4. Eircode D04 KW32 and for planning for the erection of new gates to roadside boundary at the same address.

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

The development would result in the loss of a public on-street parking space in a high-demand area and negatively impact a mature street tree, contrary to the Dublin City Development Plan 2022-2028 policies on sustainable mobility and environmental standards.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The removal of a public on-street parking space serving local residents and businesses is inconsistent with Policy SMT25 and the presumption against such loss in predominantly residential areas.
  • The proposed vehicular entrance and associated dishing fail to meet the mandatory 2.5m minimum clearance required to protect the adjacent mature street tree and its root zone.
  • Granting permission would set an undesirable precedent for similar developments that prioritize private parking over the public realm, biodiversity, and shared residential amenities.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Policy SMT25Section 8.5.7Section 15.6.9Appendix 5, Section 4.1Appendix 5, Section 4.3Appendix 5, Section 4.3.1Appendix 5, Section 4.3.2Section 4.3.7

Decision Document Summary

The application seeks retention of off-street parking and permission for new gates at 16 Newgrove Avenue, Sandymount, a mid-terrace dwelling located within an Architectural Conservation Area (ACA). Dublin City Council initially refused the proposal due to the loss of on-street parking and the potential damage to a mature street tree. The Inspector noted that the area experiences high demand for pay-and-display parking due to its proximity to Sandymount Village and local amenities. While the appl...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.

PDF Document Missing

The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.

Search for case on ABP