Core Refusal Reason
The proposed front extension is considered an inappropriate, ad-hoc, and incongruous design that would detract from the character of the existing dwelling and set an undesirable precedent.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The proposed extension is an ad-hoc and unintegrated design form that fails to respect the character, context, and fenestration of the host structure.
- The siting of the extension on the front elevation is considered visually obtrusive and would set an undesirable precedent for similar developments in the area.
- There is ample scope to increase the living area to the rear of the structure, making the proposed front-facing design solution unnecessary and contrary to proper planning.
Cited Policies (CDP)
CPO 16.27
Decision Document Summary
John and Lucy Harris sought permission for a 14sqm front extension to their single-storey dwelling at Cullenhugh, Ballinalack, Co. Westmeath. The proposal included a living area and bay window projecting approximately 4.1m from the front elevation. Westmeath County Council refused the application, determining that the design was incongruous and failed to integrate with the existing house. The planning authority concluded that the development would be visually obtrusive and contrary to Policy Obj...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.