2554
Extension of duration of planning file 20/569 :for the construction of a new extension to the side at first floor level, with alterations to the front elevation and conversion of attic to two new bedrooms with new side windows and a rear dormer window, velux windows and associated works at
Refused
Core Refusal Reason
The application for an Extension of Duration was refused because substantial works had not been carried out during the initial permission period, and mandatory information required for EIA screening was not submitted.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- Substantial works were not carried out during the appropriate period of the original planning permission (Ref. 20/569), failing to meet the statutory requirement of Section 42(1)(a)(i)(III) of the Planning and Development Act 2000.
- The applicant failed to provide the information required under Article 42(ff) of the Planning and Development Regulations 2001, preventing the Planning Authority from carrying out a mandatory Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) screening.
- The application is non-compliant with Sections 42(1)(b) and 42(1)(c) of the Planning and Development Act 2000 due to the absence of necessary environmental data and the failure to demonstrate significant progress on the permitted development.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Zoned Existing Residential [RS]
Decision Document Summary
The proposal sought an Extension of Duration for a previously permitted development (Ref. 20/569) at 48 Hazel Avenue, Monvoy Valley, Tramore, which included a first-floor side extension and attic conversion. The Planning Authority refused the request primarily because the applicant confirmed that substantial works had not been undertaken during the original permission period, a legal prerequisite for such an extension. Additionally, the application was deemed non-compliant for failing to provide...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.