3797/23
PROTECTED STRUCTURE: PERMISSION:The development will consist of the removal of 3 no. historic one-over-one sliding sash windows to front (north-west) elevation at upper ground and first floor levels & replacement with new six-over-six sliding sash windows with slimline double glazing; 1 no. new six-over-three sliding sash window with sliding sash side lights with slimline double glazing to front (north-west) elevation at lower ground floor level in reinstated wall & ope (as per previously granted application for retention No.5170/22); all associated site works to existing two storey over basement terraced house and concurrently with all works as permitted by previously granted permission No.5170/22. No.41 Percy Place is a Protected Structure.
Core Refusal Reason
The proposed removal of features would adversely affect the special architectural character and amenity of the Protected Structure, contravening local development policies and national heritage guidelines.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The removal of specific features would negatively impact the special architectural character and amenity of the Protected Structure at 41 Percy Place.
- The development would contravene Policy BHA2 of the Dublin City Development Plan 2022-2028 and national Architectural Heritage Protection Guidelines.
- Granting permission would establish an undesirable precedent for similar inappropriate developments to protected structures within the surrounding area.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
The proposal involved the removal of three features from a Protected Structure located at 41 Percy Place, Ballsbridge, Dublin 4. Dublin City Council refused the application on the grounds that the works would diminish the building's architectural integrity and historical significance. The decision emphasized that the proposal fails to comply with statutory conservation policies and would set a negative precedent for the treatment of heritage assets in the locality....PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.