Core Refusal Reason
The application for an extension of duration was refused because the development had not commenced and no substantial works were carried out within the appropriate period as required under Section 42 of the Planning and Development Act 2000.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The development to which the permission relates was not commenced before the expiration of the appropriate period sought to be extended.
- No substantial works were carried out pursuant to the permission during the appropriate period as required by Section 42(1)(a) of the Planning and Development Act 2000.
- The applicant failed to provide necessary information required under Article 42(ff) of the Planning and Development Regulations 2001, resulting in non-compliance with Section 42(1)(b) and (c) of the Act.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
Michael and Kieran Dunphy sought an extension of duration for planning permission (file 20/656) to construct a calf house and machinery shed at Lissahane, Kill, Kilmacthomas, Co. Waterford. Upon assessment and site inspection, the Planning Authority confirmed that development had not commenced and no substantial works had been undertaken. The application was refused as it failed to meet the mandatory statutory requirements of Section 42 of the Planning and Development Act 2000, which stipulates ...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.