2560205

Permission for development which consists of permission and retention : (i). Permission for the construction of a 1st Floor Extension over the existing bungalow dwelling. (ii). Permission for the construction of an additional 2-Storey Extension to the rear of the existing dwelling and combined with the development as described in paragraph (i). (iii). Permission for the installation of a new proprietary effluent treatment system & percolation area to replace the old style septic tank system. (iii). Retention of a storage shed/home office in the rear garden area at Cappagh Road Upper, Barna, Galway. H91 R6CT

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

The proposal effectively creates two self-contained residential units in an agriculturally zoned area, fails to meet mandatory overlooking separation distances, and lacks sufficient technical evidence regarding wastewater treatment compliance.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The internal layout of the proposed extension facilitates the unauthorized sub-division of the dwelling into two independent living units, which is contrary to the agricultural zoning and residential extension policies of the Development Plan.
  • The development fails to meet minimum separation distances for overlooking, particularly regarding bedroom windows on the northern elevation, which would result in a significant loss of privacy for adjoining residential properties.
  • The applicant failed to demonstrate that the proposed proprietary effluent treatment system and percolation area comply with the EPA Code of Practice, representing a potential risk to public health.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Section 11.3.1 (l)Section 11.3.1 (k)Section 11.3.1 (d)SPPR 1

Decision Document Summary

Syed Jaffry sought permission for a substantial two-storey extension to an existing bungalow and the installation of a new wastewater treatment system at Cappagh Road Upper, Barna, Galway. Although the planning authority considered the scale of a two-storey extension acceptable in principle, the application was refused because the internal design effectively created two separate apartments, which is not permitted under the site's agricultural zoning. Additionally, the proposal failed to meet ove...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.