2560924

for development which involves a protected structure (RPS805) to comprise: removal/demolition of non historic substandard extension to rear construction of new two storey extension to rear comprising dining/kitchen area to ground floor, with bedroom and bathroom to first floor; modifications to existing non historic stud partitions; re roofing to include re use of existing slates and provision of roofing felt; along with demolition of substandard out house, to include all ancillary site works and modifications. Gross floor space of proposed works: 18.40 sqm(extension). Gross floor space of any demolition: 9.68 sqm

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

The applicant failed to demonstrate that the proposed development would adequately safeguard the architectural integrity, historic fabric, and character of the protected structure and the adjoining terrace, primarily due to a deficient Architectural Heritage Impact Assessment (AHIA).

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The submitted Architectural Heritage Impact Assessment (AHIA) remained deficient and failed to provide sufficient clarity regarding the extent and justification of works to the historic fabric of the subject dwelling and the adjoining protected terrace.
  • The Planning Authority was not satisfied that the proposed demolition and new construction would adequately protect the shared boundary and the overall architectural setting of the streetscape.
  • The development as proposed was deemed contrary to specific development management standards and policy objectives of the Galway County Development Plan 2022-2028 concerning the protection of architectural heritage.

Cited Policies (CDP)

DM Standard 58DM Standard 59Policy Objective AH2Policy Objective AH6Galway County Development Plan 2022–2028

Decision Document Summary

The proposal involved the demolition of a rear extension and the construction of a new two-storey extension at 4 Lee's Terrace, Clifden, a vernacular end-of-terrace house designated as a protected structure. Although the site is zoned for residential use, the application was refused following multiple requests for further information and clarification. The Planning Authority, in agreement with the Conservation Officer, concluded that the applicant failed to provide a robust architectural assessm...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.