2560918

for the construction of a two storey rear extension to existing two storey house, construction of a two storey front extension to existing two storey house, removal of two storey gable end front projections to existing house, construction of extended parapet walls and cappings to existing wall plate level to existing house, amendments of existing side fenestrations with new doors and windows at ground and first floor level, nappe plaster band details around all doors and windows, removal of front stone and brick façade with replacement nappe plaster, construction of single storey side extensions to existing two storey house, installation of new secondary effluent treatment system and all associated site works

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

The proposed extension is considered inappropriate and excessive in terms of its scale and design, as the 327sqm of additional floor space would more than double the size of the existing dwelling.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The scale and design of the proposed extensions are deemed excessive and inappropriate, resulting in a bulk that is not considered to be in keeping with the existing dwelling.
  • Significant discrepancies exist between the current proposal and the previous planning history (File 99/1401) regarding the site configuration and the location of the domestic waste water treatment system.
  • The applicant failed to provide consistent technical information regarding the method of water supply and submitted site characterisation documentation under an incorrect name.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Chapter 15 of the Kildare County Development Plan 2023-2029Section 15.4.12

Decision Document Summary

Mairead Grogan sought permission for extensive two-storey front and rear extensions, a single-storey side extension, and various elevational modifications to an existing dwelling at Blackwood, Robertstown, Co. Kildare. The proposal would add 327sqm of floor space, effectively doubling the size of the original house. The Planning Authority determined that the scale and bulk of the development were inappropriate for the site. Furthermore, the application was found to have technical deficiencies, i...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.