Core Reason for the Refused Part
The proposed two-storey rear extension and attic alterations would adversely impact the visual and residential amenity of the site and neighboring properties, conflicting with County Development Plan standards.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The combined scale of the two-storey rear extension and attic alterations would negatively impact the visual and residential amenity of the subject site and adjacent properties.
- The development is contrary to specific County Development Plan policies regarding rear extensions and roof/attic level alterations in existing built-up areas.
- Granting permission would set an undesirable precedent for similar developments on constrained sites, undermining the 'Objective A' zoning which seeks to protect residential amenities.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Section 12.3.7.1(ii)Section 12.3.7.1(iv)
Decision Document Summary
The application at 77 Taney Avenue, Dublin 14, sought permission for the retention of a front porch and the construction of a two-storey rear extension with attic storage alterations. While the porch retention was acceptable, the planning authority issued a split decision, refusing the rear extension and attic works. The refusal was based on the determination that the scale and design of these elements would harm the residential and visual character of the area, violating the County Development ...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.