2560581

development of the following: (a) 86 no. residential units including (i) 1 no. 2 storey 4 bed detached units; (ii) 1 no. 2 storey 3 bed detached units; (iii) 13 no. 2 storey 4 bed semi-detached units; (iv) 1 no. 2 storey 3 bed semi-detached units; (v) 56 no. 2 storey 3 bed terrace units; (vi) 4 no. 1 storey 1 bed apartment units; (vii) 2 no. 1 storey 2 bed apartment units; (viii) 8 no. 2 storey 3 bed apartment units; (b) 1 storey creche (219.3m2) to include 2 no. classrooms, ancillary rooms, outdoor play area, building mounted signage, 10 no. car parking spaces and set down area and (c) all associated site works including (i) foul and surface water drainage, and water mains; (ii) storm water pumping station; (iii) detention pond; (iv) vehicular road and pedestrian connection to Airfield Point housing estate (v) car parking; (vi) landscaping and public lighting and (vii) all other associated site development works

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

The proposed development fails to meet technical standards for surface water management, provides an inadequate housing mix that does not align with local demographic requirements, and exhibits significant layout deficiencies regarding pedestrian connectivity and residential amenity.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The proposed surface water management system is technically unacceptable as it relies on pumping rather than gravity methods and fails to incorporate adequate SuDS principles, pollution mitigation, or safe emergency overflow routes.
  • The proposed housing mix, featuring only approximately 7% of 1-2 bedroom units, is considered inadequate to meet the forecasted household size cohorts and housing requirements set out in the Development Plan.
  • The site layout is poorly integrated, specifically regarding the remote location of the creche, the lack of safe pedestrian connectivity to the wider Airfield Point area, and the potential for undue overlooking from first-floor balconies onto neighboring properties.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Policy Objective H17Policy Objective H02Policy Objective H04Policy Objective H18Policy Objective CS 01Policy Objective CS 16Policy Objective UTL 09Development Management DM 06Table 7.1Table 3.1Table 3.2Section 3.4.2Section 4.7Section 8.6Section 8.8

Decision Document Summary

This application sought permission for a residential development of 86 units (comprising 72 houses and 14 apartments) and a 40-place creche on a 3.6-hectare site at Airfield Point, Coxtown East, Dunmore East. The site is situated on lands zoned 'Existing Residential' within the settlement limits of Dunmore East. The proposal was refused due to fundamental technical failures in the surface water and SuDS design, an inappropriate housing mix that fails to address local needs for smaller units, and...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.