Core Refusal Reason
The application for an extension of duration was refused because the development had not commenced and substantial works had not been carried out prior to the expiration of the original permission, failing to meet the statutory requirements of Section 42 of the Planning and Development Act 2000.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The development to which the permission relates (an extension to an existing dwelling) had not commenced and substantial works had not been carried out prior to the application for extension.
- The application fails to comply with the mandatory requirements of Section 42 [1] [a] [i] and (iii) of the Planning and Development Act 2000 (as amended).
- The proposal does not qualify as a 'housing development' under the specific provisions of Circular Letter PLR 02/2025, which might otherwise allow for extensions of un-commenced projects.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
The applicants sought an extension of duration for planning permission (Ref: 19/658) concerning the construction of an extension to an existing two-storey detached dwelling and the demolition of an outbuilding at Ballylusk, Ballyfin, Co. Laois. While the Executive Planner initially considered a grant under new provisions for un-commenced housing developments, the Senior Executive Planner determined that the project did not constitute a 'housing development' as defined by Circular Letter PLR 02/2...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.