WEB5227/25
The construction of a first-floor extension over an existing single-storey industrial unit. The proposed work will include the installation of a new roller shutter on the south-east facing façade, a new stairwell to the proposed L01 extension with a proposed entrance to same on the north east facing elevation at ground floor level to the side of the property. The first floor extension will include 2 No ancillary/storage rooms, a WC and 4 no new windows on the south-east facing elevation at L01. The unit is owner-occupied and used as storage, workshop and parking of vehicle, we intend to continue using it at various times throughout the day during normal working hours, 8 am to 6pm, the loudest machine we are currently using on the premises is no greater than 60db. As per the deeds the unit has enjoyed right of access over the laneway with or without vehicles since before 1 October 1964 leading from Botanic Avenue.
Core Refusal Reason
The proposal was refused due to inadequate documentation regarding impacts on residential amenity and the substandard nature of the existing laneway access which poses a traffic hazard.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The applicant failed to demonstrate that the commercial use and proposed extension would not negatively impact the residential conservation area through environmental nuisances such as noise, vibration, or overlooking.
- The development is inconsistent with the Z2 zoning objective and the Dublin City Development Plan 2022-2028 criteria for permissible and non-conforming uses.
- The existing access via Addison Place is substandard, and the lack of adequate vehicular maneuvering details would result in traffic hazards for service, delivery, and emergency vehicles.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
The proposal involved the construction of a first-floor extension over an existing single-storey industrial unit at 6 Addison Place, Glasnevin, Dublin 9. The application was refused by the local authority because the submitted documentation was insufficient to prove that the intensified commercial use would not harm the amenities of the surrounding residential conservation area. Additionally, the planning authority determined that the narrow laneway access is inadequate for the development, crea...PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.