2561318

The development will consist of (A) The partial demolition of an existing dwelling and upgrade works to the retained section of the existing dwelling; (B) Construction of a new two-storey extension, physically connected to the retained portion of the existing dwelling; (C) Installation of a proprietary waste-water treatment system, including a raised percolation area; (D) Upgrade and improvement of the existing vehicular site entrance and new front boundary treatment to R147, to facilitate the proposed development; (E) and all ancillary site works associated with the above.

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

The proposed extension's excessive scale and massing fail to harmonise with the existing cottage, appearing as a new dwelling rather than a subordinate extension, thereby contravening development plan objectives and injuring visual amenities.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The scale and massing of the proposed two-storey extension are excessive, projecting 11.7m wider and 2.79m taller than the original cottage, which fails to respect the character of the existing structure.
  • The development does not reflect the nature of a residential extension but instead appears as a new house akin to an existing dwelling, conflicting with the intended purpose of such developments.
  • The proposal fails to harmonise or integrate with the existing dwelling, directly contravening DM OBJ 50 of the Meath County Development Plan 2021-2027 and negatively impacting the visual amenities of the rural area.

Cited Policies (CDP)

DM OBJ 50RD POL 38RD POL 39RD POL 40Section 11.5.25

Decision Document Summary

The proposal involves the partial demolition of an existing single-storey cottage at Roestown, Dunshaughlin, and the construction of a large two-storey extension connected via a link corridor, along with a new wastewater treatment system and entrance upgrades. The site is located in a rural area zoned 'RA' and within a landscape of exceptional value and high sensitivity. Meath County Council refused permission primarily because the extension's scale and massing were deemed inappropriate and out ...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.