4004/23
PERMISSION:For the (A) Demolition of single storey extension to side of existing two-storey end of terrace dwelling house. (B) Construction of two bedroomed two storey dwelling house with off street car parking, new front entrance to side of 67 Edenmore Crescent and dishing of footpath. The new dwelling consists of living, kitchen space with WC and storage at ground floor level with 2 bedrooms, WC and storage at first floor.(C) Construction of new single storey front extension, new front entrance and dishing of footpath to 67 Edenmore Crescent.(D) All associated ancillary site works. (E) Alterations to existing red line boundary between 67 and 69 Edenmore Crescent.
Core Refusal Reason
The proposed dwelling would negatively impact the residential amenities of neighboring properties through overbearing, overshadowing, and overlooking, while providing substandard private open space for future occupants.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The development's scale and proximity would cause significant overbearing, overshadowing, and loss of aspect for the residents of No. 69 Edenmore Crescent.
- The positioning and window placement would result in unacceptable overlooking and loss of privacy for the rear garden of No. 71 Edenmore Crescent.
- The proposed private open space is of poor quality due to its narrow layout and high boundary walls, failing to meet the standards set out in Section 15.11.2 of the Development Plan.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
This application sought permission for the demolition of an existing side extension and the construction of a new dwelling at 67 Edenmore Crescent, Raheny. Dublin City Council refused the proposal primarily because the new structure would adversely affect the residential amenities of adjacent properties (No. 69 and No. 71) through overbearing impacts, overshadowing, and loss of privacy. Furthermore, the proposed dwelling failed to provide a sufficient standard of private open space for its own o...PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.