Core Refusal Reason
The unauthorized demolition of an intact thatched vernacular dwelling and its replacement with a new structure, which contravenes policies protecting rural built heritage.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The original thatched vernacular dwelling and outbuildings were considered to be in reasonable condition and suited to refurbishment rather than demolition.
- The replacement dwelling materially contravenes Louth County Development Plan policies BHC 42 and HOU 50, which seek to protect and revitalise vernacular built heritage.
- Granting retention would establish an undesirable precedent for the demolition of similar vernacular structures, undermining the character of the rural landscape.
Cited Policies (CDP)
BHC 42HOU 48HOU 50HOU 51BHC 17BHC 44NBG 50Section 3.18Section 9.8Section 13.9.11Section 13.9.12Section 13.9.13Appendix 16
Decision Document Summary
This application sought retention for a two-storey replacement dwelling at Templetown, Carlingford, Co. Louth, which replaced a traditional thatched vernacular cottage and associated outbuildings. The Planning Authority determined that the original farmstead was of considerable architectural merit and was capable of being restored despite fire damage. The development was refused as it contravenes specific County Development Plan policies regarding the preservation of vernacular architecture and ...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.