Core Refusal Reason
The proposal was refused due to the consolidation of significant unauthorised works, the inappropriate urban design of the entrance in a high-amenity rural area, and potential impacts on public health and road safety.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The development would consolidate significant unauthorised works on-site, including an urban-style entrance that is visually harmful to the character of the rural landscape and the designated Area of High Amenity.
- The applicant failed to provide sufficient information regarding the necessity of the development, fodder/bedding storage, and the impact on water quality and neighboring wells, leading to concerns over public health and environmental pollution.
- The existing entrance, characterized by high pillars and fencing, restricts sightlines and creates a serious traffic hazard, rendering the development contrary to public safety and proper planning.
Cited Policies (CDP)
CPO 9.6CPO 9.37CPO 9.38CPO 9.40CPO 9.41CPO 12.34CPO 12.54CPO 13.16CPO 17.21CPO 17.22CPO 17.23CPO 17.35Appendix 1 S2.1.9
Decision Document Summary
Matthew Peters sought permission to construct a stable building comprising three stables and a tack room at The Meetings, Rathdrum, Co. Wicklow, within a designated Area of High Amenity. Wicklow County Council refused the application primarily because it sought to consolidate extensive unauthorised works already carried out on-site, including a well, shed, and a grandiose urban-style entrance that is visually incongruous with the rural setting. Furthermore, the proposal was deemed a traffic haza...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.