Core Refusal Reason
The proposed development was refused due to inappropriate siting and design on an exposed site adjacent to the N52, resulting in a visually incongruous structure that fails to integrate into the rural landscape.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The dwelling's height, scale, and complicated fenestration design create an unbalanced and visually cluttered appearance that is contrary to rural design standards.
- The open and exposed nature of the site, combined with the elaborate use of materials, would make the development visually incongruous and detrimental to the visual amenities of the area.
- Permitting the development would set an undesirable precedent for similar poorly integrated structures in a sensitive rural location adjacent to a national secondary road.
Cited Policies (CDP)
CPO 9.1CPO 9.2CPO 9.8CPO 9.13CPO 9.14CPO 9.17CPO 9.18CPO 9.19CPO 9.20CPO 16.32CPO 16.33CPO 16.34
Decision Document Summary
John Dowdall sought permission for a storey and a half dwelling and garage at Macetown, Mullingar, on a greenfield site located between the N52 and a local road. While the applicant met the local housing need criteria, the planning authority refused the application because the proposed design was deemed excessive and cluttered, featuring complicated fenestration and overly elaborate materials. The exposed nature of the site meant the building would fail to assimilate into the landscape, thereby ...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.