Core Refusal Reason
The application failed to meet the statutory requirements for an extension of duration as it was incorrectly applied for as an un-commenced development, and the works actually performed did not constitute 'substantial works' under the Planning and Development Act.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The application was submitted under Section 42(1A) of the Planning and Development Act 2000 (as amended), which is strictly reserved for housing developments that have not yet commenced.
- A site inspection on 20/02/2026 confirmed that development works had already commenced on-site, meaning the application could not be assessed or granted under the requested Section 42(1A) criteria.
- When assessed under the alternative Section 42(1), the planning authority determined that the works carried out to date do not constitute 'substantial works' as defined by the Act, failing the statutory test for an extension.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
This application (PL26-9) sought an extension of duration for a previously permitted bungalow, detached garage, and wastewater treatment system at Sleehaun (Sankey), Legan, Co. Longford (original ref: PL20/235). While the applicant sought the extension under provisions for un-commenced developments, a local authority site visit established that works had indeed started. Upon re-evaluation under the criteria for commenced developments, the Planning Department concluded that the minimal works perf...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.