Core Refusal Reason
The Planning Authority is not satisfied with the declared planning status of the existing dwelling, specifically disputing the applicant's claim that the structure is pre-1963.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The planning status of the subject dwelling is in doubt as site inspections suggest the building is not pre-1963 as stated in the application form.
- The applicant failed to correctly outline lands under their control in blue on the site maps, as required by Article 22 of the Planning and Development Regulations 2001.
- Further documentary evidence is required to confirm the construction date and planning history of the existing house before a comprehensive assessment can be finalized.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Policy Objective RC 2Policy Objective RH 9Policy Objective NBH 1Policy Objective NHB 3Policy Objective WR 1Policy Objective FL 1Policy Objective LCM 2Policy Objective LCM 3Policy Objective WW 6Policy Objective WW 11DM Standard 4DM Standard 7DM Standard 8DM Standard 9DM Standard 11DM Standard 26DM Standard 28DM Standard 36DM Standard 38DM Standard 46DM Standard 47DM Standard 50DM Standard 67
Decision Document Summary
The applicant sought permission for a 123 sqm extension and alterations to an existing dwelling at Portacarron, Oughterard, within an area of Iconic Landscape Sensitivity. While the proposed design was considered acceptable in principle, the Planning Authority recommended a deferral of the decision (effectively refusing a grant at this stage). The primary obstacle to permission is the unverified planning status of the original dwelling, which the inspector believes was constructed post-1963, nec...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.