Core Refusal Reason
The proposal constitutes substandard, incongruous development that fails to meet minimum floor space requirements and conflicts with the established rural village character, building lines, and visual amenities.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The proposed chalet-style apartment fails to meet the minimum residential floor space standards required by Objective DMSO19, representing a substandard form of housing.
- The siting of the unit in the front garden of an existing dwelling is inconsistent with the established pattern of development and building lines in the Rural Village, causing significant injury to the area's character and visual amenities.
- The development is contrary to multiple Fingal Development Plan policies regarding rural housing design and would set an undesirable precedent for unsustainable and uncharacteristic development in a rural setting.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Table 14.9Policy SPQHP55Objective DMSO19Policy SPQHP51Objective DMSO32
Decision Document Summary
This application sought retention permission for a partially completed one-bedroom apartment, designed as a chalet, and an associated domestic shed at The Rath, Sandyhill, Rowlestown. The site is located in an area zoned 'RV - Rural Village,' which is characterized by single dwellings on large garden plots. The planning authority refused the application because the unit's design and siting in a front garden were deemed incongruous with the surrounding area and failed to meet mandatory minimum fl...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.