Core Refusal Reason
The proposed development constitutes overdevelopment of a restricted site, resulting in visual dominance, undue overlooking of neighboring properties, and a negative impact on the character of the Killiney Architectural Conservation Area.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The height, scale, and layout of the extension, combined with its proximity to boundaries, would be visually overbearing and out of character with the receiving environment.
- The design would result in undue overlooking of adjacent properties to the front, east, and north, thereby injuring residential amenities.
- The proposal would adversely affect the character of the Killiney Architectural Conservation Area (ACA) and fails to comply with the standards for dwelling extensions set out in the County Development Plan.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Section 12.3.7.1
Decision Document Summary
The proposal involved the construction of a single-storey flat roof extension at Talbot House, Killiney, a site located within an Architectural Conservation Area. The Planning Authority refused permission because the scale and design of the extension were considered excessive for the restricted site, leading to concerns regarding overdevelopment and visual dominance. Furthermore, the development was found to negatively impact the privacy of neighboring residents and the heritage character of the...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.