2660658

the development will consist of : • 1) The removal of existing front boundary hedging and replacement with a fence boundary treatment. Replacing the existing red brick of the piers and wall of the entrance gate with a stone finish; • 2) Replacing the existing red brick finish with a stone finish of the external wall; • 3) Retention for two existing sheds located within the rear garden used for domestic storage and an art room. Together with all associated site works

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

The proposed development was refused due to its negative impact on the rural character and visual amenity of the area, the loss of significant hedgerow, and the failure to demonstrate safe traffic sightlines.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The proposed 2.1m boundary fence and stone cladding are considered visually incongruous and out of character with the rural landscape, failing to comply with the Meath Rural House Design Guide.
  • The removal of approximately 60m of existing hedgerow results in the loss of biodiversity and fragmentation of the rural boundary, contrary to policies protecting natural heritage.
  • The applicant failed to demonstrate that unobstructed sightlines can be maintained in accordance with TII standards, posing a potential traffic hazard and endangering public safety.

Cited Policies (CDP)

DM OBJ 11RD POL 9HER POL 37HER POL 53

Decision Document Summary

The proposal sought permission for the removal of a front boundary hedge and its replacement with a 2.1m fence, stone re-cladding of entrance piers and the dwelling's external walls, and retention of two rear sheds at Tatestown, Navan. Meath County Council refused the application because the proposed boundary treatment and finishes were deemed visually intrusive and inconsistent with the rural character of the area. Furthermore, the loss of extensive hedgerow was considered ecologically damaging...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.