4133/23
The proposed development will consist of; a) Demolition of existing annex to the rear, b) Demolition of existing shed abutting the boundary wall to the rear c) Demolition of chimney to the side, d) Single storey flat roof extension to rear with rooflights e) two storey flat roof extension to the rear and side f) External insulation to the existing house g) Widening of existing vehicular entrance to 3.5m and all associated site works.
Core Planning Reasoning
The proposed development is considered an acceptable form of development that complies with the Z1 zoning objective and the development standards of the Dublin City Development Plan 2022-2028, and it would not significantly injure the residential or visual amenities of the area or adjoining properties.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The principle of the residential extension is acceptable under the Z1 zoning objective 'to protect, provide and improve residential amenities.'
- The scale, height, and depth of the proposed extensions (both single and two-storey) are considered appropriate and will not result in significant adverse impacts on the residential amenities of the neighboring property at No. 24 in terms of overshadowing or visual dominance.
- The proposed development, subject to conditions regarding driveway width and external finishes, adequately integrates with the existing dwelling and the established pattern of development in the wider area.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
The proposal involves the demolition of an existing annex, shed, and chimney at 26 Fortfield Road, Terenure, and the construction of single-storey and two-storey extensions to the rear and side, along with external insulation and the widening of a vehicular entrance. The site is a semi-detached two-storey dwelling on a generous plot with a 39m rear garden. A third-party appeal from the occupants of No. 24 raised concerns regarding inaccuracies in the site plans, potential for significant oversha...PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.
Search for case on ABP