Core Refusal Reason
The development materially contravenes a previous planning condition and negatively impacts the streetscape character through the unauthorized removal of the front boundary wall.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The development represents a material contravention of Condition 1 of the original planning permission granted under Reg. Ref. F23A/0091.
- The total removal of the front boundary wall is detrimental to the character and visual amenity of the existing streetscape.
- Granting retention would set an undesirable precedent for similar developments and would be contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Objective DMSO204
Decision Document Summary
This application sought retention permission for modifications to a previously approved development at 5 Sutton Park, Sutton, including the omission of a first-floor element and the removal of the front boundary wall. The Planning Authority refused the application on the grounds that it violates specific conditions of the parent permission and materially contravenes Objective DMSO204 of the Fingal Development Plan 2023-2029. The removal of the boundary wall was specifically cited as being injuri...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.