4232/23
PERMISSION: For development on a site of approx. 0.01 ha at 7A Eaton Road, Terenure, Dublin 6W (Site to the rear of 7 Eaton Terenure, Dublin Road, 6W, D6W CR63). The development will consist of the demolition of an existing single storey light industrial building (overall height approx. 3m) most recently in use as a building contractor's workshop, offices and store (approx. 82 sq m) and the construction of a new part single storey and part two storey (overall height approx. 6m) two bedroom mews type dwelling (approx. 81 sq m); associated private open space; rooflights; 2 no. access gates; and all associated landscaping , boundary treatment , site clearance and development works site.
Core Refusal Reason
The proposed mews dwelling is considered overbearing, injurious to residential amenity, and fails to meet the required access standards for mews developments on a narrow laneway.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The two-storey mews dwelling would result in an overbearing form of development that seriously injures the residential amenities of adjacent properties at 7 and 8 Eaton Road.
- The proposal constitutes undesirable backland development that would set an unfavorable precedent for similar developments along the narrow laneway.
- The development fails to comply with the Dublin City Development Plan standards for mews dwellings, specifically regarding suitable access arrangements.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
The proposal sought permission for a two-storey mews dwelling on a 0.01 ha site located to the rear of 7 Eaton Road, Terenure, Dublin 6W. Dublin City Council refused the application because the scale and proximity of the building were deemed overbearing to neighboring gardens and inconsistent with the Z1 residential zoning. Additionally, the narrow width of the laneway was found insufficient to meet the access standards for mews developments as set out in Section 15.13.5 of the Development Plan,...PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.