Core Reason for the Refused Part
The Inspector recommended granting permission (overturning the Planning Authority's partial refusal), concluding that the proposed modifications to the rear of the protected structure are sensitive and facilitate its use as a family home without damaging architectural heritage.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The proposed design for the ground and first floor levels represents a sensitive and effective reversion of the house to its original function as a family home.
- While the front of the terrace is substantially intact, the rear is already much altered, making the Planning Authority's refusal of the bay window modification overly prescriptive.
- The development is in accordance with the Architectural Heritage Protection Guidelines and the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Zoned ARPS no 824De Vesci Tce and Gardens Architectural Conservation Area (ACA)Chapter 11 - Heritage and ConservationChapter 12 - Development Management
Decision Document Summary
This report assesses a first-party appeal against a split decision by Dun Laoghaire-Rathdown County Council regarding a 4-storey mid-terrace protected structure at 14 Vesey Place. The applicants proposed internal renovations and the conversion of a non-original rear bay window into a doorway with a bridge/steps to the garden. The Council refused the doorway element, citing concerns for the character of the rear elevation. The Inspector disagreed, noting that while the front facade is protected a...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.
Search for case on ABP