4281/23
RETENTION PERMISSION: the description of the development is as follows: retention permission required for (i) 4 no. flagpoles on the west elevation to Aungier Street, (ii) 3 no. advertising canopies: 1 no. located on the west elevation to Aungier Street and 2 no. located to the north elevation to Longford Street Little, (iii) 3 no. wall mounted historical advertising signs on the north elevation to Longford Street Little, (iv) 3 no. wall mounted benches on the north elevation to Longford Street Little.
Core Refusal Reason
The retention of the flagpoles, canopies, and signs constitutes visual clutter that injures the character of the Conservation Area, while the benches create a hazard to pedestrian safety on a narrow footpath.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The flagpoles, advertising canopies, and wall-mounted signs are visually obtrusive features that contribute to visual clutter and fail to respect the sensitive historic streetscape and Conservation Area status.
- The wall-mounted benches and canopies, specifically those located on the narrow footpath of Longford Street Little, represent a significant hazard to pedestrian safety by obstructing the public domain and potentially forcing pedestrians onto the roadway.
- The development is contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area as it conflicts with the policies of the Dublin City Development Plan 2022-2028 regarding high-quality public realm and heritage protection.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
This report concerns a retention application for several external additions to the Thomas Moore Inn, a 4-storey public house located at a prominent corner of Aungier Street and Longford Street Little, Dublin 2. The site is situated within a designated Conservation Area. The development seeking retention includes four flagpoles, three advertising canopies, three historical advertising signs, and three folding wall-mounted benches. The Inspector notes a history of previous refusals for identical p...PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.
Search for case on ABP