Core Refusal Reason
The Inspector recommends a grant of permission, concluding that the single-storey extension, which incorporates a sloped roof design and respects the established building line, provides a reasonable standard of accommodation without adversely impacting the residential amenities of neighboring properties or the character of the area.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The proposed single-storey extension is consistent with the residential zoning objective and the established pattern of development in the surrounding area.
- The modified design, featuring a sloped roof reducing to 2.1m at the boundary, successfully mitigates potential overshadowing and overbearing impacts on the adjacent property at No. 72 Bath Avenue.
- While the quantitative open space provision is slightly below standard, it is qualitatively adequate for an inner-city dwelling and complies with the overall intent of the Development Plan.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Dublin City Development Plan 2022-2028Appendix 18 (Ancillary Residential Accommodation)Section 1.1 (General Design Principles)Chapter 15 (Development Standards)Section 15.11Section 15.11.3 (Private Open Space)Zoning Objective Z1
Decision Document Summary
This report assesses a first-party appeal regarding a proposed 25sqm single-storey rear extension at 71 Derrynane Gardens, Sandymount, a corner site. Dublin City Council originally refused permission, citing concerns over visual obtrusiveness, the breaking of the building line on Bath Avenue, and inadequate private open space. The Inspector evaluates the appeal, noting that the applicant modified the design to include a sloped roof to reduce impact on the neighbor. The Inspector argues that the ...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.
Search for case on ABP