Core Reason for the Refused Part
The proposed western extension was refused due to its excessive bulk, breach of the front building line, and height exceeding the eaves, which would negatively impact the streetscape and visual amenity.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The proposed extension to the western elevation would result in an adverse visual impact on the existing dwelling and the surrounding streetscape due to its excessive bulk and scale.
- The development would significantly break the established front building line and exceed the existing eaves level, making it visually incongruous with the character of the area.
- Granting permission would set an undesirable precedent for similar developments that contravene specific County Development Plan policies regarding front and side extensions and the protection of older building features.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Section 12.3.7.1(iii) Extensions to the SideSection 12.3.7.1(i) Extensions to the FrontSection 11.4.3.3 Policy Objective HER21: Nineteenth and Twentieth Century Buildings, Estates and Features
Decision Document Summary
This application sought permission for the demolition of a single-storey lean-to and outhouse, alongside a proposed extension at 5 Harold's Grange Road, Rathfarnham. While parts of the development were granted, the Planning Authority refused the western side/front extension. The refusal was based on the extension's excessive bulk, its failure to respect the front building line, and its height exceeding the eaves level, which were deemed to be visually intrusive and contrary to the Dún Laoghaire-...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.