Core Reason for the Refused Part
The proposed first-floor extension was refused due to its overbearing impact on the neighboring property, inadequate separation distances to the rear, and the resulting deficiency in private open space for the dwelling.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The first-floor extension would result in an unacceptable overbearing impact on the adjoining property to the west due to its form and proximity to the common boundary.
- The applicant failed to demonstrate adequate separation distances between the proposed first-floor windows and the habitable rooms of the dwelling to the rear.
- The retention of the ground-floor extension combined with the proposed works results in a significant deficit of private amenity garden space, contrary to development plan standards.
Cited Policies (CDP)
South Dublin County Development Plan 2022-2028 requirements relating to private amenity space provisionSouth Dublin County Development Plan 2022-2028 provisions regarding residential extensions
Decision Document Summary
This application at 47 Dodsboro Cottages, Lucan, sought retention permission for a ground-floor rear extension and planning permission for a first-floor rear extension. While the Planning Authority granted retention for the ground-floor works, the first-floor element was refused. The decision was based on the extension's overbearing physical relationship with the western neighbor, potential overlooking issues due to insufficient separation distances, and the excessive site coverage which leaves ...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.