Core Refusal Reason
While the Planning Authority refused permission due to concerns over overlooking and amenity impacts, the Inspector recommends a grant, concluding that the revised design, which includes high-level windows and a reduced scale, is compatible with the character of the existing dwelling and does not negatively impact the amenities of the area.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The design, scale, and mass of the proposed extension are considered acceptable and in keeping with the character of the existing semi-detached dwelling and the wider residential area.
- The use of high-level windows for first-floor ancillary rooms (office/playroom) effectively mitigates potential overlooking of adjoining properties while providing adequate amenity for the residents.
- The proposal complies with the 'RS' zoning objective and specific policies of the Fingal Development Plan 2023-2029 regarding residential extensions, and it will not seriously injure the visual or residential amenities of the vicinity.
Cited Policies (CDP)
RS Zoning ObjectiveSection 3.5.13.1: Residential ExtensionsPolicy SPQHP41 – Residential ExtensionsObjective SPQHO45 – Domestic ExtensionsSection 14.10.2 Extension to DwellingsSection 14.10.2.1 Front ExtensionsSection 14.10.2.2 Side ExtensionsSection 14.10.2.4 First Floor ExtensionsObjective DMSO23 – Separation Distance
Decision Document Summary
The application involves a two-storey extension (c. 107.8m²) to the side and rear of a semi-detached house at 39 Brookhaven Rise, Blanchardstown. The site is located at the end of a cul-de-sac, adjacent to public open space to the north. Fingal County Council initially refused permission, citing concerns that the development would cause overlooking, fail to provide a satisfactory standard of residential amenity, and materially contravene the 'RS' zoning objective. The Inspector's assessment high...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.