Core Refusal Reason
The Planning Authority originally refused permission citing that the development would be visually dominant, incongruous with the established character of the Strand Road streetscape, and would negatively impact the setting of protected structures. However, the Inspector recommended a grant of permission, concluding that the principle of infill development is established and that, subject to the omission of one dwelling (House Type B) and a specific balcony, the proposal would not seriously injure the visual or residential amenities of the area.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The proposed infill development is acceptable in principle under the 'RS Residential' zoning and aligns with national policy objectives for compact urban growth on underutilised sites.
- While the contemporary design of the altered 'Barbary' is acceptable, House Type B must be omitted as its height and proximity to 'Slieverue Lodge' would create a significant and negative overbearing impact.
- The proposed development, following a Stage 2 Appropriate Assessment and with the implementation of mitigation measures in the NIS, will not adversely affect the integrity of the North Dublin Bay SAC or North Bull Island SPA.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Objective SPQHO39 (New Infill Development)Objective HCAO24 (Protected Structures and ACAs)Objective GINHO56 (Visual Impact Assessments)Objective SPQHO42 (Infill, Corner and Backland Sites)Objective SPQHO36 (Public Open Space)Objective SPQHO37 (Residential Consolidation)Objective SPQHO38 (Sustainable Densities)Objective DMSO53 (Financial contributions for open space)Chapter 14 (Development Management Standards)
Decision Document Summary
The application seeks permission for the extension and modernization of an existing dormer bungalow, 'Barbary', and the construction of three new detached 2.5-storey houses in its rear garden at Strand Road, Sutton. The 0.31ha site is located within the buffer zone of the Howth Special Amenity Area Order (SAAO) and adjoins the protected structure 'Slieverue'. Fingal County Council initially refused permission on grounds of overdevelopment, visual impact on the streetscape, and potential injury t...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.