Core Refusal Reason
The proposed development was refused due to an inappropriate design that fails to respect the Architectural Conservation Area and nearby Protected Structures, alongside concerns regarding emergency vehicle access and social housing obligations.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The design and layout are considered incongruous with the site's sensitive context, failing to reinforce the urban form of Gort or protect the character of the Architectural Conservation Area and adjacent Protected Structures.
- The applicant failed to demonstrate that the narrow width of Slipper Street can safely accommodate emergency and service vehicle access, potentially endangering public safety.
- The application lacked adequate proposals to satisfy statutory obligations under Section 96 of the Planning and Development Act regarding social and affordable housing.
Cited Policies (CDP)
CS 1CS 2SS 4HS 1SH 1PM 1PM 8PM 9PM 10PM 11PM 13CGR 1CGR 4CGR 12CGR 13WW 5AH 1AH 2AH 4AH 5AH 6AH 12AH 14DMS 1DMS 2DMS 11DMS 31DMS 36DMS 60Section 3.5.8
Decision Document Summary
The applicant sought permission to demolish existing sheds and remnants of a gable wall (formerly an abattoir) to construct two semi-detached, two-storey houses on Slipper Street in Gort town centre. While the principle of residential regeneration on this brownfield site was supported, the Planning Authority refused the application because the modern design was deemed unsuitable for its location within an Architectural Conservation Area and its proximity to several Protected Structures. Addition...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.