Core Refusal Reason
The proposed dwelling's excessive scale, bulk, and siting on a prominent corner site would result in overbearing visual impacts and disrupt the established building line and streetscape character.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The development's scale and bulk on a prominent corner site would be visually disruptive and overbearing to adjacent properties and the public road.
- The proposal significantly exceeds the established rear building line and features an incongruous three-storey/dormer element that negatively impacts the streetscape character.
- The scheme is contrary to specific County Development Plan policies regarding corner/side garden sites and infill development, setting a poor precedent for the area.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Section 12.3.7.5 Corner/Side Garden SitesSection 12.3.7.7 Infill
Decision Document Summary
This application sought permission for the construction of a three-storey detached dwelling and associated demolition at 19 Taney Avenue, Goatstown, a prominent corner site. The local authority refused permission because the proposed structure's excessive scale and bulk would protrude beyond established building lines, creating an overbearing and visually disruptive impact on the surrounding residential environment. The design, particularly the large rear dormer, was deemed incongruous with the ...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.