Core Refusal Reason
The proposal constitutes overdevelopment of a restricted site, resulting in substandard private open space, negative residential amenity impacts, and insufficient car parking.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The development provides inadequate quantitative and qualitative private open space for both the existing and proposed dwellings, failing to meet minimum standards for backland development.
- The scale, height, and proximity of the structure would result in visual overbearing, overlooking of neighboring property no. 35A, and an incongruous appearance within the established residential context.
- The proposal fails to provide sufficient off-street car parking for a four-bedroom dwelling in Parking Zone 2, setting an undesirable precedent for the area.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Section 12.8.3.3(i)Table 12.10Section 12.3.7.6Section 12.4.5.1(ii)Table 12.5
Decision Document Summary
The application proposed the construction of a 148.59sqm, 4-bedroom single-storey dwelling with an attic at 36 Rosemount Estate, Dundrum. The Planning Authority refused permission on the grounds that the project represents overdevelopment of a restricted site. The refusal was based on the failure to provide adequate private open space for both the new and existing homes, the negative visual and privacy impacts on adjacent properties, and the lack of sufficient off-street parking, all of which we...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.