F23A/0706

Permission is sought for the construction of a single storey extension

Granted

Core Planning Reasoning

The Inspector recommended granting permission for the single-storey side extension as originally proposed, concluding that the set-back required by the Planning Authority's condition was unnecessary because the design integrates well with the existing dwelling, does not prejudice public services, and the removal of existing trees is justified due to their poor condition and inappropriate proximity to structures.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The proposed extension, while closer to the footpath than the original dwelling, remains within the site curtilage and does not pose a risk to existing water or utility services.
  • The removal of the existing boundary wall and two pear blossom trees is acceptable as they have limited visual impact on the streetscape and the trees are planted too close to masonry to be sustainable.
  • The scale, massing, and design of the extension as submitted harmonizes with the existing character of the area and will not adversely impact the residential amenities of adjacent properties.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Fingal Development Plan 2023 – 2029Chapter 3: Sustainable Placemaking and Quality HomesSection 3.5.13.1 Residential ExtensionsPolicy SPQHP41 – Residential ExtensionsObjective SPQHO45 – Domestic ExtensionsChapter 14 Development StandardsSection 14.10.2 Residential ExtensionsSection 14.10.2.2 Side ExtensionsForest of Fingal, A Tree Strategy for FingalParagraph 4.9.63 (Tree separation distances)BS5837:2012 Trees in relation to design, demolition and construction

Decision Document Summary

The application seeks permission for a 29.1 sq.m single-storey side extension to 77 Delvin Banks, Naul. Fingal County Council granted permission but included Condition 2(a) requiring a significant set-back of the front elevation to protect underground services and retain existing landscaping. The applicant appealed this condition, stating it would make the extension unusable and that the existing trees were hazardous. The Inspector's assessment focused on whether the original design would harm s...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.