4813/23
PROTECTED STRUCTURE:PERMISSION & RETENTION:a) Planning permission for: i) lowering of cills of 4 no. square-headed and 1 no arch-headed window to the ground floor front (north) façade, and the extension of the original window and door frames to fit the new enlarged openings (incorporating redundant vent opening to the basement). ii) reinstatement of 5 no brass railings from original cill to new cill positions b) Retention permission for: i) recoating with paint of external surface of ground floor window and door frames, in lieu of previous clear coating; ii)enlargement of existing opening, and formation of a new opening in oak panelled wall between front lounge and entrance hall; iii) the removal of the lead cames to the ground floor windows and their re-glazing with safety glass;
Core Reason for the Refused Part
The removal of the lead cames and their replacement with clear glass is considered detrimental to the architectural character of the Protected Structure and the Conservation Area, as the cames are an integral component of the original 1930s design.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The lowering of the window cills to ground level is acceptable as it enhances the permeability and welcoming appearance of the hotel frontage, consistent with a previously permitted 2007 design.
- Internal alterations to the oak panelling are justified as they significantly improve circulation and permeability within the ground floor without causing undue damage to the structural fabric.
- The reinstatement of the lead cames is required because their removal resulted in a loss of character and architectural integrity that outweighs the applicant's arguments for transparency and thermal insulation.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
This report concerns a first-party appeal for a hybrid application at the Clarence Hotel, a Protected Structure in Dublin 2. The proposal included lowering window cills, reinstating brass railings, painting window frames, and internal alterations to oak panelling, alongside the retention of removed lead cames. While the Planning Authority initially issued a split decision, the Inspector recommended granting permission for the majority of the works—including the lowering of cills to improve stree...PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.
Search for case on ABP