Core Planning Reasoning
The proposed development is consistent with the residential zoning and established pattern of development in the area. Subject to compliance with conditions, it would not seriously injure residential, visual, or heritage amenities, nor would it create a traffic or pedestrian hazard on Trafalgar Lane.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- Disputes regarding the ownership and legal rights over the private laneway (Trafalgar Lane) are civil matters to be resolved in the Courts and do not constitute valid grounds for refusal under the planning system.
- The proposed vehicular access is parallel to a low-speed, low-traffic private laneway and would not create a traffic or pedestrian hazard, as visibility is sufficient and movements would mirror existing resident parking behaviors.
- The physical alterations to the granite boundary wall are minimal and do not result in a significant loss of historic fabric, thereby preserving the integrity and character of the Protected Structure and the Monkstown Architectural Conservation Area.
Cited Policies (CDP)
HER7: Record of Protected StructuresHER8: Work to Protected StructuresHER13: Architectural Conservation Areas12.3.4: Residential Development – General Requirements12.3.4.1: Road and Footpath Requirements12.4.8: Vehicular Entrances and Hardstanding Areas12.4.8.1: General Specifications12.4.8.2: Visual and Physical Impacts12.4.8.3: Driveways/Hardstanding Areas12.4.8.4: ACAs/Protected Structures12.8.7.2: Boundaries12.11: Heritage12.11.3: Architectural Conservation Areas
Decision Document Summary
Planning permission is sought for a new vehicular entrance and electric double gates at the rear of 1 Belgrave Square North, a Protected Structure located within the Monkstown Architectural Conservation Area. The site backs onto Trafalgar Lane, a narrow private laneway. The proposal involves partial demolition of an outbuilding and the widening of an existing pedestrian gate to facilitate off-street car parking and an EV charging point. The application was appealed by third parties who raised co...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.
Search for case on ABP