20231460

The Planning Authority refused permission on the grounds of prematurity, as the development was dependent on the completion of infrastructure (surface water drainage and public open space) on an adjacent site. However, the Inspector recommended a grant of permission, concluding that these issues could be managed via phasing conditions and noting the common ownership of both sites.

• The proposed development represents an efficient use of serviced land at an appropriate density (35-42 units per hectare) for a designated Key Town, aligning with national compact growth objectives.
• The dependency on shared infrastructure with the adjoining permitted development (PA 20231461) does not render the project premature, as both sites are under the applicant's control and delivery can be secured through phasing conditions.
• The four-storey design, massing, and architectural treatment are considered compatible with the receiving environment and the transitional character of the area without compromising residential amenities.