Core Planning Reasoning
The Inspector recommended granting permission, concluding that the development is consistent with the residential zoning objective and the proper planning and sustainable development of the area, as it provides a reasonable standard of accommodation without causing significant adverse impacts on the amenities of adjoining properties.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The proposed development would provide a reasonable standard of accommodation on site and is consistent with the Sustainable Residential Development and Compact Settlement Guidelines for Planning Authorities (2024).
- The extension has been designed to mirror the height and roof profile of the adjoining two-storey dwelling, ensuring it harmonizes with the existing streetscape and does not appear overbearing.
- Residential amenities of neighboring properties are protected through the use of high-level windows and angled elevations to prevent overlooking, and the provided private open space is considered qualitatively acceptable for a suburban adaptation.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Chapter 13 (Land Use Zoning Objectives) Table 13.1.1Zoning Objective 'A'Chapter 2 (Core Strategy) Policy Objective CS11 - Compact GrowthChapter 4 Policy Objective PHP19 (Existing Housing Stock-Adaptation)Policy Objective PHP20 (Protection of Existing Residential Amenity)Chapter 12 (Development Management) Section 12.3.7.1 (Extensions to Dwellings)Section 12.3.7.1 (i) (Front Extensions)Section 12.3.7.1 (ii) (Extensions to the Rear)Section 12.3.7.1 (iii) (Extensions to the Side)
Decision Document Summary
The proposal involves the refurbishment and two-storey extension of an existing bungalow at 14 The Orchard, Monkstown Valley. This includes the removal of the original pitched roof to allow for a first-floor addition, creating a four-bedroom dwelling. A third-party appeal from the residents of No. 11 The Orchard raised concerns regarding the scale, massing, and potential for overlooking due to the site's sloping topography. The Inspector dismissed these concerns, noting that the development inte...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.
Search for case on ABP