Core Planning Reasoning
The Inspector recommended upholding a condition requiring the reduction of the dormer width from 5m to 3.5m, as the structure's existing scale and bulk seriously injure the residential and visual amenities of the area and set an undesirable precedent.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The previous Board determination (ABP 310248-21) limiting the dormer to 3.5m remains valid and the applicants have not demonstrated a material change in circumstances to justify a departure from this.
- The unauthorized 5m wide dormer is excessive in scale and massing, causing a detrimental impact on the visual and residential amenities of neighboring properties.
- Arguments regarding financial burden and alleged local precedents do not override the requirement for the development to adhere to established design guidance and protect the character of the suburban estate.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Fingal Development Plan 2023-2029Zoning Objective RS (Residential Development)Policy SPQ HP41 (Residential Extensions)Policy SPQ HO45 (Domestic Extensions)Section 14.10.2.5
Decision Document Summary
The application concerns the retention of an unauthorized rear dormer extension at a semi-detached house in Swords, County Dublin. The structure as built is approximately 5m wide, whereas a previous Board decision on the same site had restricted such a development to 3.5m. The Planning Authority granted retention permission subject to Condition 3, which again required the width to be reduced to 3.5m. The applicant appealed this specific condition, citing financial hardship and similar developmen...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.