Core Planning Reasoning
The Inspector recommended the omission of Condition 3, concluding that the proposed contemporary design response—featuring a flat roof, brick finish, and corner window—is a valid architectural solution given the site's unique 'bookend' location on a curved streetscape and aligns with development plan policies supporting high-quality contemporary architecture in conservation areas.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The proposed contemporary design is contextually appropriate for the subject site, which serves as a 'bookend' to a row of houses at a point where the streetscape changes axis.
- The cantilevered form of the extension is an atypical design feature where standardizing the roof profile and materials to match the original house would result in a visually unsatisfactory hybrid design.
- The proposal complies with Policy BHA9 and Appendix 18 of the Development Plan, providing a high-quality design that enhances the character of the Z2 conservation area rather than detracting from it.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Dublin City Development Plan 2022-2028Z2 (Residential Conservation) ZoningChapter 15 (Development Standards)Policy BHA9Chapter 11 (Archaeology & Built Heritage)Appendix 18 (Ancillary Residential Accommodation)Section 1 (Residential Extensions)Section 1.1 (General Design Principles)
Decision Document Summary
This Inspector's Report assesses a first-party appeal regarding Condition 3 of a planning grant for a first-floor side extension and single-storey rear extension at 25 Merton Drive, Ranelagh. The property is a 1930s semi-detached dwelling within a Z2 Residential Conservation Area. Dublin City Council's Condition 3 required the redesign of the first-floor extension to include a pitched roof, pebble dash finish, and standardized windows to match the existing dwelling. The Inspector noted that the ...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.
Search for case on ABP