Core Planning Reasoning
Grant permission with modifications; the Inspector determined that while the principle of development is acceptable under the 'Objective A' residential zoning, the proposed front extension incorporating the existing balcony must be omitted to preserve the architectural symmetry of the 1930s streetscape and prevent overshadowing of the adjoining property.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The proposed first-floor front extension would disrupt a defining architectural feature (the bay window with balcony) common to the 1930s dwellings on Bird Avenue and should be omitted via condition.
- The two-storey side extension, rear extension, and attic conversion are considered acceptable in scale and design and will not cause undue overshadowing or overlooking of neighboring properties.
- The development, as modified by conditions, is in accordance with the proper planning and sustainable development of the area and the provisions of the operative County Development Plan.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Section 12.3.7.1 of the Dun Laoghaire Rathdown County Development Plan 2022-2028Part 9i (extensions to the front)Part iv (alterations at roof / attic level)
Decision Document Summary
This report concerns an appeal against the grant of permission for extensive renovations at a semi-detached 1930s house in Clonskeagh, Dublin 14. The proposal includes a two-storey side extension, a single-storey rear extension, an attic conversion with a dormer, and a front extension that incorporates an existing first-floor balcony. The site is located in an area zoned 'Objective A' (Residential). Third-party appellants argued the development was excessive in scale, would devalue property, and...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.
Search for case on ABP