Core Refusal Reason
The proposal was refused due to traffic safety hazards on a rural road, insufficient drainage information, and potential interference with the environmental compliance of an existing licensed waste facility.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The development would endanger road safety and create a traffic hazard by significantly intensifying the use of an existing access point on a rural road (L-1020-3) where the maximum speed limit applies.
- Inadequate information regarding site drainage capabilities prevents a proper assessment of impacts on the existing system, making the proposal prejudicial to public health.
- The lack of clarity regarding the use of the structure within a licensed waste permit facility could compromise the environmentally safe operation and regulatory compliance of the End of Life Vehicle facility.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
This application sought permission for an extension to an existing steel-framed building at Ballyboy, Tombrack, located within a site operating as a licensed End of Life Vehicle facility. The Planning Authority refused the proposal because the resulting intensification of traffic on the L-1020-3 rural road would create a public safety hazard. Furthermore, the applicant failed to provide sufficient technical data concerning drainage or the specific intended use of the extension, leading to concer...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.